Buckeye Dairy News: Volume 12 Issue 5
Breadcrumb Menu
-
Dairy Market Outlook: January - February 2011
Dr. Cameron Thraen, Extension Specialist, The Ohio State University
The USDA Milk Production report, released December 18, 2010, shows continued strength in milk production across the country. For November, the 23 state production was up 3.1% over last year and the U.S. total was up 2.7%. This is the sixth straight month that the 23 state total is up 2.7% or better.
Gains in milk production are coming from the western and some eastern states. Arizona production was up +8.7%, Oregon up +8.4%, Idaho up 7.2%, Washington up +6.0%, and California showing a 4.5% growth. Out east, New York added 4.6% and Pennsylvania upped production by 3.2% vs. last year. Midwestern states did not fare as well with Iowa down 3.3%, Minnesota down 1.5% and Wisconsin up marginally 0.5% for November versus last year.
Milk output per cow continues to be a major contributor to these production gains, but it is getting harder to maintain these gains as milk prices sink and feed prices rise. The USDA released its December Livestock, Dairy and Poultry (LDP) Report, December 20, 2010. The 2011 outlook for U.S. dairy is for a slight increase in milk production, up 1.4%, a slight reduction in imports due to international prices exceeding U.S. prices, and a decline in U.S. exports, from 8.3 billion pounds in 2010 to 6.3 billion pounds in 2011.
With the anticipation of weaker milk prices, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) 12-month Class 3 average for 2011 is right at $14.50/cwt, the real profit killer will be the USDA forecast for feed prices. According to the USDA LDP report, corn is expected to be in the $4.80 to $5.60/bu range for the 2010/11 crop year and soybean meal in the $310 to $350/ton range. Higher feed prices, coupled with a reduced milk price, the current near-term 6-month CME Class 3 price average is $14.00/cwt, will put the squeeze on dairy margins in the coming months. The impact will become evident by mid-2011. The CME Class 3 has this priced in with the out-6 months of 2011 averaging a dollar higher at $15.03/cwt.
If you have not explored the use of the Livestock Gross Margin (LGM) insurance product, this may be the time to take a careful look at this product and determine whether or not it will work for your dairy operation. If you looked at it earlier, you may take a new look as there are a couple of important changes which are just now going into effect. You can find detailed information at the University of Wisconsin website: http://future.aae.wisc.edu/lgm_dairy.html. At this site, you will find a web-based program which will allow you to test out the LGM using your numbers. Here in Ohio, you can also attend one of the up-coming OSU Extension workshops, to be held in mid February 2011 on this topic. Contact the OSUE Wayne County agricultural educator, Dianne Shoemaker (shoemaker.3@osu.edu) at the Wayne County OSU Extension office, for more details on these workshops.
-
The Cost of Nutrients, Comparison of Feedstuff Prices and the Current Dairy Situation
Dr. Normand St-Pierre, Dairy Management Specialist, The Ohio State University (top of page) pdf file
At this time of the year, I wish that I could bring you some good news. I am afraid, however, that what has been a modest recovery for our dairy farms starting in late spring is about to end. Most dairy farms, still under the shock of the 2009 financial disaster, now barely hold their heads above the water. What’s next? Feed prices have gone through the roof, and the November decline in milk prices is just the beginning of further declines based on the current cash prices of butter and especially cheese. Tight financial management will be the norm for the first half of 2011.
First, let us look at feed prices. As usual in this column, I used the software SESAME™ that we developed at Ohio State to price the important nutrients in dairy rations to estimate break-even prices of all major commodities traded in Ohio and to identify feedstuffs that currently are significantly underpriced. Price estimates of net energy lactation (NEl, $/Mcal), metabolizable protein (MP, $/lb – MP is the sum of the digestible microbial protein and digestible rumen-undegradable protein of a feed), non-effective NDF (ne-NDF, $/lb), and effective NDF (e-NDF, $/lb) are reported in Table 2. Compared to historical averages (i.e., since January 2005), NEL is now priced at about average (10¢/lb). For MP, these figures stand at a premium of about 20¢/lb, or a 195 % premium over the 6 year average. Thus, although we have seen a substantial increase in the price of corn and other energy commodities this fall, the rise in the protein complex has been more substantial. One must keep in mind that over the last 20 years, dietary energy (NEL) has been priced at about 5¢/Mcal. Thus, the current dietary energy cost is still well above the long-run average. The cost of ne-NDF is currently discounted by the markets (i.e., feeds with a significant content of non effective NDF are price discounted), but the discount is at about the 6-year average. Meanwhile, unit costs of e-NDF are historically low, with a discount of about 2 ¢/lb over the 6-year average. Home-grown forages can be inexpensive sources of this important nutrient.
Based on mid December wholesale prices, central Ohio, feed commodities can be partitioned into the three following groups (Table 1). The disconcerting thing from this table is that only 4 feeds are currently in the bargain column, and nearly half of all feeds are in the overpriced column. This limits potential feed cost savings from feed ingredient substitution.
Table 1. Partitioning of feedstuffs, Ohio, mid-December 2011.
Bargains At Breakeven
Overpriced
Distillers dried grains
Gluten feed
Meat meal
Soybean meal – expellerAlfalfa hay
Bakery byproducts
Brewers grains, wet
Canola meal
Corn, ground, shelled
Corn silage
41% Cottonseed meal
Whole cottonseed
Gluten meal
48% Soybean meal
Wheat bran
Wheat middlingsBlood meal
Beet pulp
Citrus pulp
Feather meal
Fish meal
Hominy
Molasses
44% Soybean meal
Soybean hulls
Roasted soybeans
TallowAs usual, I must remind the readers that these results do not mean that you can formulate a balanced diet using only feeds in the bargain column. Feeds in the “bargains” column offer savings opportunity, and their usage should be maximized within the limits of a properly balanced diet. In addition, prices within a commodity type can vary considerably because of quality differences as well as non-nutritional value added by some suppliers in the form of nutritional services, blending, terms of credit, etc. In addition, there are reasons that a feed might be a very good fit in your feeding program while not appearing in the “bargains” column. For example, molasses is often used to reduce ingredient separation in TMR. Molasses is also an excellent source of sugars. Some nutritionists balance rations for sugars. In those situations, molasses might not be at all overpriced.
One must remember that SESAME compares all commodities at one point in time, mid December in our case. Thus, the results do not imply that the bargain feeds are cheap on a historical basis.
In Table 3, we report the detailed results for all 27 feed commodities. The lower and upper limits mark the 75% confidence range for the predicted (break-even) prices. Feeds in the “Appraisal Set” were either deemed outliers (completely out of price), or had an unknown price (e.g., alfalfa hay of different qualities).
Table 2. Prices of dairy nutrients for Ohio dairy farms, mid-December 2010.

Table 3. Actual, breakeven (predicted) and 75% confidence limits of 27 feed commodities used on Ohio dairy farms, mid-December 2010.

-
Reducing the Use of Copper Sulfate in Footbaths
Dr. Bill Weiss, Dairy Nutrition Specialist, The Ohio State University (top of page) pdf file
The proper use of footbaths can be an effective component of a herd’s hoof health program. Digital dermatitis (also referred to as hairy heel warts, heel warts, etc.) and hoof rot are two hoof problems that can be controlled by the use of foot baths. The predominant active ingredient in most footbaths is copper sulfate and is quite effective. However, the cost of copper sulfate is high and because used foot bath solution is usually dumped into the manure stream, excessive copper loading of soils can occur when the manure is spread on fields. A recent study (Speijers et al., 2010. Journal of Dairy Science) evaluated different aspects of using copper sulfate footbaths. In one study, a 2% copper sulfate solution was compared with a 5% solution (both used for 4 consecutive milkings once per week) on cows that had a very high prevalence of digital dermatitis (65% of the cows had an active lesion on at least one foot). In a second study with cows that had a lower prevalence of digital dermatitis (~20% of the cows had an active lesion on at least one foot), the same comparison was made except cows walked through the footbath 4 consecutive milkings every other week.A typical footbath holds 40 to 50 gallons of solution and should be changed after 150 to 300 cows walk through it. For a 200 cow herd that uses a footbath 4 consecutive milkings once a week, reducing the copper sulfate from 5% to a 2% would save about 2200 lb of copper sulfate per year. If the herd changed from a 5% solution weekly to a 2% solution every 2 wk, copper sulfate use would be reduced by about 3000 lb annually. However, these savings in copper sulfate must not come at the cost of increased hoof problems. The major findings of this study were:
- When a group of cows with a high prevalence of digital dermatitis walked through a footbath 4 consecutive milkings once weekly, both the 2 and 5% copper sulfate solution significantly decreased digital dermatitis, but the 5% solution had a slightly greater effect. The prevalence decreased from 69 to 13% over an 8 week period (82% decrease) with the 5% solution and decreased from 66 to 18% (73% decrease) with the 2% solution. Overall, if cows are walking through a footbath once weekly for 4 consecutive milkings, a 2% solution appears to be acceptable.
- When a group of cows with a moderate prevalence of digital dermatitis walked through a footbath 4 consecutive milkings every other week, a 5% solution was much more effective than a 2% solution. Prevalence of cows with an active lesion for digital dermatitis decreased from 20% to 7% (65% decrease) over an 8 week period when a 5% solution was used but only decreased 36% (from 22 to 14%) when a 2% solution was used.
Bottom line: Reducing the concentration of copper sulfate from 5 to 2% may not greatly affect the efficacy of a footbath when used weekly but will greatly reduce cost and environmental impact. On the other hand, reducing the frequency of using a footbath from weekly to every other week had a substantial negative effect on efficacy and a 2% solution was not adequate.
-
2010 Forage Performance Trials
Dr. Mark Sulc, Forage Extension Specialist, The Ohio State University
The 2010 Forage Performance Trial Results are available online at http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~perf/. The report summarizes data on commercial varieties of alfalfa, red clover, white clover and tall fescue in tests planted in 2008 to 2010 across three sites in Ohio (South Charleston, Wooster, and North Baltimore). Alfalfa varieties in established stands ranged in 2010 yield from 5 to 9 tons of dry matter per acre and in a spring seeding from 2 to 3 tons per acre. Alfalfa varieties with resistance to potato leafhopper yielded 7 to 19% more than the susceptible check varieties in an unsprayed (no insecticide) trial across three years of data. Tall fescue varieties ranged in 2010 yield from 4.7 to 5.3 tons per acre. Red and white clover trials were seeded in 2010 at South Charleston. The reported yield of red and white clover varieties was low because the first-harvest yields were not included due to a weed infestation during establishment. Dry weather also had a major impact on subsequent summer harvesting; however, good stands were established.
-
OSU Animal Welfare Symposium: A Big Success
Dr. Naomi Botheras, Animal Welfare Extension Specialist, The Ohio State University
The Ohio State University’s 2nd Annual Animal Welfare Symposium was held on November 30 in Columbus. Approximately 350 people came to hear Dr. Temple Grandin and a number of other speakers address farm animal welfare issues of importance to Ohio agriculture.
The event was co-organized by Dr. Naomi Botheras (Department of Animal Sciences) and Dr. Candace Croney (Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine), and co-hosted by the Department of Animal Sciences and the College of Veterinary Medicine at The Ohio State University, who are partners in the Australian Animal Welfare Science Centre.
The program kicked off with presentations by Dr. Linda Lobao from the School of Environment and Natural Resources at The Ohio State University and Mr. Charlie Arnot from the Center for Food Integrity, who both spoke about results of recent surveys of consumers’ perceptions of farm animal welfare and the implications for Ohio. Dr. Grandin, Department of Animal Sciences at Colorado State University, discussed humane handling of farm animals, including compromised and non-ambulatory animals. Dr. Jan Shearer eloquently presented information about when compromised animals should be euthanized and correct euthanasia techniques. An update on the activities of the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board was also provided by Dr. Tony Forshey, State Veterinarian and member of the Board. The afternoon wrapped up with a panel discussion of industry and professional organization representatives, including Mr. Scott Higgins from the Ohio Dairy Producers Association, describing their latest efforts to address animal welfare issues. Excellent questions and discussions from the audience followed each of the presentations.
Thanks to the Symposium sponsors Bob Evans Farms, Inc., Ohio Farm Bureau Federation, Ohio Veterinary Medical Association, and Osborne Industries. Inc.
Video/audio recordings of all presentations from the Symposium are available to view on-line at: http://vet.osu.edu/preventive-medicine/AnimalWelfareSymposium.
Dr. Temple Grandin
Panel Discussion
A large crowd gathered at the 4-H Center. -
2011 4-H Youth Programs
Mrs. Bonnie Ayars, Extension Dairy Program Specialist, The Ohio State University
Tis the season to wrap up 2010 and think ahead for 2011 4-H Youth Programs. The 2011 Dairy 4-H calendar is now posted on the opening page at www.4hansci.osu.edu/dairy. Just this month, the calendar and a letter was mailed out to every 4-H dairy youth that participated in any statewide event and also to every junior dairy exhibitor at the Ohio State Fair. This provided us an opportunity to reach everyone on a more personal level.
Also, posted on the web page is the current issue of my newsletter, Bonnie’s Buckeye Moos. It includes several updates on new programming, current events, news, and notes, as well as information about our recognition program for dairy 4-Hers. Each county will have the opportunity to nominate their members who attended any statewide event (judging contest, skillathons, state fair, clinics, Dairy COWreer Day, etc.) I will review all nominees and then award Gold, Silver, and Bronze certificates based on their participation. These will be sent in the mail in January. County programs will have the opportunity to recognize youth by awarding these at county dairy banquets. It could also encourage financial support from dairy committees.
A new program on the calendar is the Dairy Palooza on April 30th to be held at the Grammer Jersey Farm. We continue to have many interested dairy youth who live in the northeastern area but who do not often make it to state events. Therefore, we decided to take the message to them. It will be a day filled with hands-on activities focused on topics of interest. Topics will include how to select your 4-H dairy project, showmanship tips, clipping and fitting, animal husbandry, and a dairy science activity, and there will also be topics of interest for only Cloverbuds. Volunteers are going to make the day special, and we offer our gratitude to the Grammers for opening up their farm and cattle for this event. -
Students Excel in 2010 Ohio Dairy Challenge Contest
Dr. Maurice Eastridge, Extension Dairy Specialist, The Ohio State University
The 2010 Ohio Dairy Challenge was held November 19-20 and was again sponsored by Cargill Animal Nutrition. The Dairy Challenge provides the opportunity for undergraduates at Ohio State University to experience the process of evaluating management practices on a dairy farm and to interact with representatives in the dairy industry. The program is held in a contest format whereby students are grouped into teams of three to four individuals, and the first, second, and third place team m0embers received gift certificates to the Barnes and Noble Bookstore at $100, $75, and $50 each, respectively. The farm selected for the contest this year was the Van Raay Dairy in South Charleston, OH (Clark County), and it is owned by Mr. Ted Van Raay. The farm was begun in 2004 with 800 Holstein cows and today it has 2055 cows, with plans for expansion underway. The parlor is a double-24 herringbone and cows are milked 3x per day. The rolling herd averages were 23,225 lb milk, 3.7% fat, and 3.2% protein. The contest started by the students and the judges spending about two hours at the farm on Friday afternoon, interviewing the owner and examining the specific areas of the dairy facility. During Friday evening, the teams spent about four hours reviewing their notes and farm records to provide a summary of the strengths and opportunities of the operation in the format of a MS PowerPoint presentation that had to be turned in on Friday evening. On Saturday, the students then had 20 minutes to present their results and 10 minutes for questions from the judges. The judges were Mr. Fred Martsolf (Cargill Animal Nutrition), Mr. Bob Hostetler (Cargill Animal Nutrition), Ms. Michele Burky (Cargill Animal Nutrition), Dr. Maurice Eastridge (Professor, Department of Animal Sciences, OSU), and Dr. K. Larry Smith (Professor Emeritus, Department of Animal Sciences, OSU). There were 10 teams and 36 students that participated in the program. The awards banquet was held on Saturday, November 20 at the new Ohio Union on the OSU Columbus campus. Individuals listed below and designated with an asterisk were recognized as providing outstanding contributions to their teams. The first place team consisted of Andy Lefeld*, Teresa Smith*, Stephanie Neal*, and Alissa Hunter*, with the second place team consisting of Carly Kestler*, Jessica Simons, Kathleen Shircliff*, and Zachary Grauer. Linda Brahler, Jason Hartschuh*, Kyle Brockman, and Sabrina Eick were on the third place team. The students among the other teams (no particular order) competing were: Team #4 –Hannah Thompson*, Laura Gordon*, Matthew Borchers, and Kevin Jacque; Team #5 (ATI) – Abigail Styron and Arthur Stoller; Team #6 – Stephanie Adams, Darrin Hulit, Kelsey Holter, and Courtney Umhoefer; Team #7– Katelin Jarman*, Larissa Hileman, Alexandra Mailloux-Beauchemin, and Casey Skowron; Team #8 – Justin Rawn, Tricia Tenzek, Chad Riethman, and Derik Baumer*; Team #9 – Kathryn Lamar, Melinda Miller, and Tori Fraizer; and Team # 10 – Jason Miley*, Emily Severt*, and Lindsey Raubenolt. The top 4 individuals for the contest that were selected to represent Ohio at the 2011 National Contest, to be hosted by North Carolina State University during March 31 to April 2 in Hickory, NC, were Andy Lefeld, Teresa Smith, Stephanie Neal, and Alissa Hunter. Students from OSU will also be participating in the Midwest Regional Dairy Challenge hosted by the University of Wisconsin – River Falls in Menomonie, WI to be held February 9-11, 2011. The coach for the Dairy Challenge is Dr. Maurice Eastridge in the Department of Animal Sciences at Ohio State.
First Place Team (left to right):
Teresa Smith, Stephanie Neal,
Andy Lefeld, and Alissa Hunter.
Second Place Team (left to right):
Zachary Grauer, Kathleen Shircliff,
Jessica Simons, and Carly Kestler.
Third Place Team (left to right):
Kyle Brockman, Linda Brahler,
Sabrina Eick, and Jason Hartschuh.