Buckeye Dairy News: VOLUME 23, ISSUE 5
Breadcrumb Menu
-
Milk Prices, Costs of Nutrients, Margins, and Comparison of Feedstuffs Prices
April F. White, Graduate Research Associate, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University
Milk Prices
In the last issue, the Class III futures for August and September were at $16.50/cwt and $16.66/cwt, respectively. Class III closed lower than predicted at $15.95/cwt in August, with protein and milk fat at $2.45/lb and $1.85/lb, respectively. This marks a continued decline in both fat and protein prices since May of 2021. This issue, the Class III future for October is $17.46/cwt, followed by a slight decrease to $17.13/cwt in November.
Updated Corn Silage Price
A new corn silage price used throughout this article was calculated this month as corn silage harvest winds down across the state. This year’s approximate price for normal corn silage (32 to 38% dry matter), based on a $5.36/bu corn grain price at start of day September 27, 2021, is $60.75/ton. Due to the higher December corn future this year ($5.36/bu compared to $3.65/bu this time last year), corn silage is increased in value by ~$14/ton compared to last season ($46.63/ton). However, based on its nutritive value, home grown corn silage continues to be a bargain feed in dairy cattle rations.
Nutrient Prices
It can be helpful to compare the prices in Table 1 to the 5-year averages. The price of net energy for lactation (NEL) is about 32% lower than the 5-year average ($0.08/Mcal), while metabolizable protein (MP) and physically-effective neutral detergent fiber (pe-NDF) are 36 and 59% higher than the 5-year averages ($0.38/lb and $0.08/lb, respectively). These fluctuations in nutrient price are in line with the seasonal adjustments to nutrient prices over the last 5 years.
To estimate profitability at these nutrient prices, the Cow-Jones Index was used for average US cows weighing 1500 lb and producing milk with 3.9% fat and 3.2% protein. For January’s issue, the income over nutrient cost (IONC) for cows milking 70 and 85 lb/day is about $9.21 and $9.68/cwt, respectively. Both estimates are likely to be profitable. As a word of caution, these estimates of IONC do not account for the cost of replacements or dry cows, or for profitability changes related to culling cows.
Table 1. Prices of dairy nutrients for Ohio dairy farms, September 27, 2021.
Economic Value of FeedsResults of the Sesame analysis for central Ohio on September 27, 2021 are presented in Table 2. Detailed results for all 26 feed commodities are reported. The lower and upper limits mark the 75% confidence range for the predicted (break-even) prices. Feeds in the “Appraisal Set” were those for which we didn’t have a local price or were adjusted to reflect their true (“Corrected”) value in a lactating diet. One must remember that SESAME™ compares all commodities at one specific point in time. Thus, the results do not imply that the bargain feeds are cheap on a historical basis. Feeds for which a price was not reported were added to the appraisal set this issue.
Table 2. Actual, breakeven (predicted) and 75% confidence limits of 26 feed commodities used on Ohio dairy farms, September 27, 2021
For convenience, Table 3 summarizes the economic classification of feeds according to their outcome in the SESAME™ analysis. Feedstuffs that have gone up in price based on current nutrient values, or in other words moved a column to the right since the last issue, are in oversized text. Conversely, feedstuffs that have moved to the left (i.e., decreased in value) are undersized text. These shifts (i.e., feeds moving columns to the left or right) in price are only temporary changes relative to other feedstuffs within the last two months and do not reflect historical prices. Feeds added to the appraisal set were removed from this table.Table 3. Partitioning of feedstuffs in Ohio, September 27, 2021.
Bargains At Breakeven Overpriced Gluten meal Feather meal Mechanically extracted canola meal Wheat middlings Soybean hulls Corn silage Wheat bran Soybean meal - expeller Distillers dried grains 48% Soybean meal 44% Soybean meal Gluten feed Alfalfa hay - 40% NDF Solvent extracted canola meal 41% Cottonseed meal Meat meal Corn, ground, dry
Whole, roasted soybeans Hominy
As coined by Dr. St-Pierre, I must remind the readers that these results do not mean that you can formulate a balanced diet using only feeds in the “bargains” column. Feeds in the “bargains” column offer a savings opportunity, and their usage should be maximized within the limits of a properly balanced diet. In addition, prices within a commodity type can vary considerably because of quality differences as well as non-nutritional value added by some suppliers in the form of nutritional services, blending, terms of credit, etc. Also, there are reasons that a feed might be a very good fit in your feeding program while not appearing in the “bargains” column. For example, your nutritionist might be using some molasses in your rations for reasons other than its NEL and MP contents.
Appendix
For those of you who use the 5-nutrient group values (i.e., replace metabolizable protein by rumen degradable protein and digestible rumen undegradable protein), see Table 4.
Table 4. Prices of dairy nutrients using the 5-nutrient solution for Ohio dairy farms, September 27, 2021.
-
Highlights from the Recent USDA Dairy Forecast
Chris Zoller, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tuscarawas County
The latest USDA Economic Research Service (USDA ERS) Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook was released on September 16, 2021. The complete report is available here: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/outlooks/102168/ldp-m-327.pdf?v=6900. This article will highlight sections from the dairy portion of the report.
Supply and Use
July 2021 milk production was 2% higher than the same month in 2020, the number of dairy animals peaked in May 2021 at 9.509 million head, and the July number came in at 9.500 million head. Increased culling and slaughter of dairy cows at federally inspected plants contributed to these changes. Milk production for July 2021 was 14 lb higher than July 2020, averaging 2,015 lb/cow.
Corn and soybean meal prices were lowered in the recent report. The 2021-2022 marketing year average for corn was reduced to $5.45/bushel. Soybean meal for 2020-2021 is projected at $360/ton. The hay market continues to be strong. Alfalfa hay in July was $201/ton, up $2/ton from June 2021 and $29/ton more than July 2020.
Dairy Forecast
Milk cow inventory has been reduced by 15,000 from the previous month to 9.485 million head because of increased culling and higher slaughter numbers. The estimated milk at 24,010 lb/cow in 2021 is 10 lb lower than the previous month’s projection. USDA ERS is expecting milk production to be 227.8 billion lb for 2021.
Milk Price Forecast - 2021
Category Forecast Price Class III $16.65/cwt Class IV $15.55/cwt All Milk $18.15/cwt Milk Price Forecast - 2022
Category Forecast Price Class III $16.45 Class IV $16.05 All Milk $18.40 -
Livestock Medication Records: Are They Really Necessary?
Chris Zoller, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tuscarawas County and Gustavo M. Schuenemann, Professor and Dairy Extension Veterinarian, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University Extension
At a recent Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) training session, we discussed livestock drug use, proper administration, the importance of following the label (and veterinary instructions), and the importance of keeping records of drugs administered.
Real-Life Example
A producer attending the session stood up and described to the group what happened when he had an animal test positive for a drug residue. An official from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) came to his farm multiple times until finding him at home. He was required to write a letter explaining what steps he would take to prevent the issue from arising again. The FDA determined the first letter wasn’t adequate in addressing their concerns. He was provided with websites to consult and had to write another letter addressing the concerns. The producer now keeps detailed medication records and strongly encouraged every livestock producer to do the same!
Food Producing Animals
In livestock production, a medication may be necessary to treat diseases and restore health. Feed additives containing medications must be used only according to the label instruction. However, if precautions are not taken, problems can arise when an animal tests positive for a drug residue violation in meat, milk, and eggs. Remember, these are food producing animals and it is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that a safe product is available to consumers. Drug and chemical residues in meat, milk, and eggs are of public health concern.
The FDA regulates the use of livestock medications in the United States and establishes tolerance levels for residues in meat, milk, and eggs. Following label recommendations and maintaining accurate and proper treatment records helps ensure that violations do not occur.
Figure 1. Maintaining accurate and proper treatment records is just as important as having adequate working facilities!
Key Points
The following key points are from the document Adequate Drug Treatment Records Help Ensure Food Safety, available at this FDA website: https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animal-health-literacy/adequate-drug-treatment-records-help-ensure-food-safety
Live animals sold for slaughter for human consumption are considered food.
Under the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FFD&C Act), the definition of “food” includes “articles used for food or drink for man or other animals.” FDA considers live animals intended for food as “food” under the FFD&C Act.
Food held under insanitary conditions is adulterated under the law.
The FFD&C Act states that a food is adulterated “if it has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health.”
Giving drugs to animals without keeping adequate records can constitute “insanitary conditions.”
In cases involving illegal drug residues in dairy cows, district courts have agreed with the U.S. government that the failure of a dairy farm to keep adequate records of the administration of drugs constituted inadequate control measures. The courts found that these inadequate control measures created “insanitary conditions” and, therefore, adulterated the food under the FFD&C Act.
Drug residues in edible tissues above a level set by FDA (the “tolerance”) are illegal.
When a food-producing animal is treated with a drug, residues of the drug sometimes remain in or on edible tissues from that animal. Residues include small amounts of leftover drug, or parts of the drug that aren’t completely broken down by the animal’s body. Immediately after administering a medication to sick animals, the drug enters the blood stream and is typically metabolized by liver and then eliminated by the kidney via urine. Most sick animals experience some degree of dehydration and low intake (feed and water) due to pain, and this may extend the drug clearance from the animal. Keep your treated animals fully hydrated to avoid residues in milk or meat.
FDA, through its Center for Veterinary Medicine, makes sure the residues that may be present in or on edible tissues from treated animals pose little risk to people. As part of the approval process for any drug intended for use in food-producing animals, the agency sets the drug’s tolerance and withdrawal period. The tolerance is the level of residues allowed to be in or on the edible tissues. Residues higher than this level are called “violative” because they violate (are above) the tolerance set by FDA.
The withdrawal period is the time from when the animal was last treated with the drug to when the animal can be slaughtered for food or selling milk. The withdrawal period allows for the drug (or parts of the drug known as metabolites) in the edible tissues of the treated animal to get to levels that are at or below the tolerance.
It is illegal for dairy farmers, livestock dealers, and other animal producers to sell an animal for food that has drug residues in its edible tissues that are above the set tolerance.
What enforcement action can FDA take if I have a violation?
The producer described above did not have to pay any fines for the violation he incurred. However, having to research information, make phone calls, work with the veterinary of record, and write two letters consumed much of his time. Let’s take a look at possible enforcement action FDA may take against violators:
Warning letters – Are sent to the individuals or firms, advising them of specific noted violations. These letters request a written response as to the steps which will be taken to correct the violation.
Injunction – An order by a court that requires an individual or corporation to do or refrain from doing a specific act.
Criminal prosecution – May be recommended in appropriate cases for violation of Section 301 of the Act. Misdemeanor convictions, which do not require proof of intent to violate the Act, can result in fines and/or imprisonment up to one year. Felony convictions, which apply in the case of a second violation or intent to defraud or mislead, can result in fines and/or imprisonment up to three years.
Criminal Fines for Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Violations
Misdemeanor fines under the Act may reach $500,000 under some circumstances. The Criminal Fine Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law 98-596) provides for fines for violations of Federal law. Although it is not part of the Act, the Criminal Fine Enforcement Act of 1994 applies to all fines levied under the Act, as well as other statutes that contain provisions enforced by FDA.
The following fines are applicable for each offense:
- Up to $100,000 for a misdemeanor by an individual that does not result in death.
- Up to $200,000 for a misdemeanor by a corporation that does not result in death.
- Up to $250,000 for a misdemeanor by an individual that results in death or a felony.
- Up to $500,000 for a misdemeanor by a corporation that results in death or a felony.
The maximum imprisonment for a misdemeanor under the Act remains a year for each offense.
What drug treatment information do I need to maintain?
When treating food animals with any medications, the following must be recorded:
- Name of the drug used;
- Identity of the animal treated;
- Date of each administration of the drug to the animal;
- The dose;
- Route of administration. How the drug was given (for example, by mouth or by injection into muscle);
- The lawful written order of a licensed veterinarian in the context of a veterinarian-client-patient relationship (if applicable);
- Name of the person who gave the drug;
- Length of the withdrawal period; and
- Date the withdrawal period ends (milk can return to the bulk tank or treated animal can safely be sent to slaughter on or after this date).
Veterinary Client Patient Relationship (VCPR)
A VCPR is just what it says – a working relationship with a veterinarian who is familiar with your animals, production practices, and works with you to develop plans to prevent, control and treat diseases. The veterinarian is referred to as your Veterinarian of Record (VoR), and both the VoR and the client should sign a form to document this relationship. If this is you, excellent! If emergency situations are the only times you see a veterinarian, maybe it’s time to schedule a visit to establish and document the VCPR.
Summary
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure! Drug and chemical residues entering the food chain (milk, meat, or eggs) are of public health concern. Review and adjust health protocols at least once per year with your veterinarian. It really is in your financial best interest to avoid residues entering the food chain to maintain your market channels. In the event you receive an FDA letter indicating a residue violation was found in milk or meat, please contact your veterinarian immediately to develop the response letter documenting the corrective actions.
Sources
Adequate Drug Records Help Ensure Food Safety, Food and Drug Administration, https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animal-health-literacy/adequate-drug-treatment-records-help-ensure-food-safety
Types of FDA Enforcement Actions, Food and Drug Administration, https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/resources-you/types-fda-enforcement-actions
Veterinary Feed Directive, https://vet.osu.edu/sites/vet.osu.edu/files/documents/extension/Brochure_VFD.pdf
Veterinary-Client-Patient-Relationship (VCPR) Template, https://vet.osu.edu/extension/general-food-fiber-animal-resources
-
Antibiotic Stewardship in Calves – Part 1
Haley Zynda, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Wayne County, Ohio State University Extension
You’ve likely heard of Beef Quality Assurance, but what about Veal Quality Assurance? Essentially, it is the same type of certification for the well-being and proper handling of veal calves. However, a new addition to the certification training is antibiotic stewardship – a concept translatable to almost every livestock operation out there. The goal of the program is for farm personnel to correctly identify calves for treatment using a treatment protocol written by the herd veterinarian, thus improving responsible use of antibiotics. Drs. Jessica Pempek and Greg Habing put together a three-part training, of which I’ll summarize each with their own article.
Part 1 of the Antibiotic Stewardship in Calves is titled “Antibiotic Use and Resistance.” Before we jump into details, do you know the specifics on different types of medication? What do antibiotics treat? If you answered viral, fungal, protozoal, or parasitic infections, unfortunately you’d be incorrect. An antibiotic is a medicine that inhibits the growth of or kills bacteria. Antibiotics are not to be used to treat any other type of infection.
How about vaccines? They’re a hot topic right now in human medicine, but their purpose is the same in livestock. They introduce a viral or bacterial pathogen in an inert form to prime the immune system to attack it, should the animal be exposed to the pathogen in real time later. Vaccines can be a modified-live form, killed form, or conjugate form, and cause the body to recognize and make antibodies against that specific disease-causing organism. Vaccines prevent disease, not cure it.
Lastly, what about NSAIDs, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? These drugs are the parallels to our ibuprofen or acetaminophen. These drugs do not prevent disease or cure infections, but instead reduce fever or inflammation that may be associated with an infection. Examples include flunixin meglumine, phenylbutazone, or meloxicam.
Now, back to antibiotics. It’s important to remember, not all bacteria are bad. There are very good bacteria that live in the digestive tract of calves and mature cows (the rumen wouldn’t function without them!). The bad bacteria are referred to as pathogens, and these bacteria cause the naval infections, pinkeye, and some pneumonia and diarrhea cases we see in calves. When using antibiotics, the medication does not pick and choose which bacteria it kills, other than using its mode of action (way of prohibiting bacterial growth). That means good bacteria along with pathogens are impacted when administering an antibiotic. Bacteria in the digestive tract unfortunately may take a hit, too. This will likely cause a disruption to the gut microbiome and digestion efficiency, and those good microbes will need to be repopulated again.
Overusing antibiotics or misusing them can lead to antibiotic resistance, or resistance by the bacteria to the antibiotic. Widespread resistance can eventually lead to bacterial populations unable to be controlled by medication for both livestock and humans. We, as humans, can be infected by the same or similar pathogens as livestock because we share segments of the gene pool (we’re all in the mammalian family). Therefore, antibiotic resistance not only affects livestock producers, but the lay people as well.
Overusing or misusing antibiotics causes resistance by selecting for the bacteria that are not killed or inhibited by the medicine. For example, let’s say there is a 5-day old calf presenting with diarrhea. For this age of calf, the causative pathogens may be E. coli, clostridia, cryptosporidium, rotavirus, or coronavirus. While waiting for the fecal culture results, you treat with an antibiotic. Fast forward after you’ve already given several doses of antibiotic – the culture is negative for bacteria and you’re dealing with a viral infection. Unfortunately, the antibiotics have already gotten to work. They’ve negatively impacted the good bacteria in the gut, and if there are any pathogenic bacteria in the system, have killed off the susceptible ones but left the resistant bacteria alone. The “lone rangers” will now have full access to replicate and pass on their resistant genes, potentially causing an issue down the line, especially if the same protocol is followed every time there is a sick calf.
Reducing the risk for antibiotic resistance starts with judicial antibiotic use. This means using the proper medication for the issue at hand. Having a veterinary-client-patient working relationship is essential to knowing when and when not to use an antibiotic. Discuss a treatment protocol with your vet. Using antibiotic alternatives may also reduce the chance of resistance. Minor infections may be handled simply using palliative care (giving an NSAID if the animal is in considerable pain, keeping a wound clean, providing fresh and dry bedding, etc.). Lastly, preventing disease before it occurs eliminates the need to use antibiotics entirely. Farm cleanliness, sick animal quarantine, and worker hygiene can all contribute to reduced disease transfer.
Reducing antibiotic resistance can start with anyone. Talk to your vet about antibiotic use on your farm and stay tuned for Part 2!
-
Answering Farmers’ Questions About the Pandemic in 2021
Dr. Gustavo Schuenemann, Professor and Extension Veterinarian, and Jeffrey Workman, Extension Program Coordinator, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University
COVID-19 has certainly dominated the headlines and many of our daily conversations since March, 2020. For those directly involved in production agriculture, our lives and routines may have been disrupted, but our daily business and responsibilities of farming and raising livestock never stopped.
Times like these should remind everyone of the importance of having a robust food production system to ensure a nation’s food security. Below are the frequently asked questions we receive when visiting farms.
To answer these questions, we should look at the unbiased science. The challenge with looking at the science regarding COVID-19 is that portions of the science do not yet exist, or are not yet confirmed through replication and hard evidence. Time must pass in order to generate data.
Science is evolving as researchers around the world continue to study and learn more to create unbiased new knowledge that informs all of us. Answering one research question may lead to several new research questions, or the correct answer backed by science is no longer relevant moving forward as the virus has changed.
The “gold standard” that we typically use in the U.S. for sharing information and making decisions regarding public health are the recommendations coming from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC develops and changes their recommendations based on the available scientific data at any given time.
There are coronaviruses on my farm — is this the same as COVID-19?
No, there are animal coronavirus infections that are caused by different strains of coronavirus, such as calf diarrhea, winter dysentery in cows, and bovine respiratory disease complex (shipping fever). To prevent losses, producers vaccinate their animals to protect against diseases caused by coronavirus.
When and how will the COVID-19 pandemic end?
We can’t yet say exactly when the pandemic will end, but we do know that the pandemic will essentially be over when the individuals who make up the population achieve some level of immunity which ultimately stops the spread.
How do you get immunity?
Immunity may be natural, or infection-induced, in which a person is infected with the virus and recovers. Immunity can also be vaccine-induced in which a vaccine helps the body to produce antibodies. Individuals who make up the population must achieve immunity to stop the spread and ultimately end the pandemic.
What is herd immunity?
Herd (or group) immunity occurs when a large portion of the population (or herd) has some level of immunity to a virus. This means if someone who didn’t have enough immunity becomes exposed and infected, the likelihood of them passing it on to someone else is much less because the majority of their contacts in their surroundings already have immunity.
When a virus infects an individual, the individual either recovers or succumbs, and the virus can only survive by spreading to another host individual. We see in other viruses, such as the measles and mumps, in which the US population already has herd immunity, there are occasional small, isolated outbreaks, but the virus is unable to develop into a pandemic.
Is immunity a sure thing?
Typically, immunity from most viruses is never 100%. For example, we achieve immunity from the chickenpox virus through natural infection or vaccination, but there are still a few cases of reinfection identified worldwide. Influenza (flu) viruses have the ability to mutate, adapt, change, and jump across species.
As the flu virus changes, a person who has been vaccinated over several years, and also has some infection-induced immunity, may still become infected. However, they have some immunity that lessons the severity of their infection and results in a faster recovery.
Why should I get vaccinated?
The safest way to achieve some degree of immunity against COVID-19 is through vaccination. The current COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be as high as 94% effective at preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations. The Delta variant is the newest strain of concern because it appears to be more contagious and severe than earlier strains of COVID-19. All indications thus far are that individuals who are fully vaccinated have protection from the Delta variant. It is important to keep in mind, if we learn that immunity wanes over time, or that the virus has significantly changed so that the current vaccine-induced immunity (or infection-induced immunity) is no longer effective, there could be recommendations for booster shots or other vaccine formulations at some point in the future. Individuals should choose whichever vaccine is available and they have the opportunity to receive. Current efficacy percentages reported are developed from subsets of people, and the true efficacy numbers will become much more valid and reliable as datasets become much larger and time passes.
Keep in mind that the efficacy of the annual influenza vaccines is typically only 40 to 60%. All three COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe and effective. Everyone is biologically different and side effects vary. The reward (immunity or some degree of immunity from COVID-19) outweighs the risk (potential vaccine side effects).
To conclude, the safest way to achieve immunity or some degree of immunity is by becoming fully vaccinated (individuals need both doses of a two-dose series). If an individual doesn’t achieve immunity that fully prevents infection, they may achieve a degree of immunity that decreases the severity of symptoms and duration.
We all do personal risk assessments and consider the risk-benefit ratio each and every day without even thinking about it. There is risk in getting up in the morning and going to work. There is risk in driving a vehicle, operating machinery, flying on an airplane, and so on. Essentially everything we do in life has some degree of risk, but when individuals determine the benefit or reward outweighs the risk, they must carry on and move forward. Talk to your doctor or health care provider to discuss the best option for you and your family.
-
H2Ohio Cover Crop Usage
Jamie Hampton, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Auglaize County, Ohio State University Extension
A collaborative approach to the issues facing Ohio’s water is how the H2Ohio website defines their program. Launched in 2019 as a water quality initiative to address the inflow of nutrients into the water system of northern Ohio, the H2Ohio program has grown. Starting with 14 counties in the Northwest corner of Ohio along the Maumee River watershed, the program originally included: Williams, Defiance, Paulding, Van Wert, Mercer, Fulton, Henry, Putnam, Allen, Auglaize, Lucas, Wood, Hancock, and Hardin Counties. The area has grown to include Seneca, Huron, Erie, Wyandot, Ottawa, Crawford, Marion, Richland, Sandusky, and Shelby Counties.
With the expansion of counties, it will be beneficial to revisit some of the goals and guidelines associated with the best management practices (BMP) that the program recognizes. BMP’s are practices that help in the prevention or reduction in the amount of pollution generated by nonpoint sources. The H2Ohio program outlines 10 practices that they defer to for phosphorus reduction. Those practices are soil testing, variable-rate fertilization, subsurface nutrient application, manure incorporation, conservation crop rotation, cover crops, drainage water management, two-stage ditch construction, edge-of-field buffers, and wetlands. Combining these practices with a Voluntary Nutrient Management Plan (VNMP), there could be benefits to the water system as well as the producer.
Cover crops go hand-in-hand with several of the BMP’s that H2Ohio uses, allowing for higher levels of control of the nutrient movement on your operation. Cover crops are beneficial when used with some of the BMP’s that H2Ohio recommends. With manure applications, cover crops are required when applied after July 1 and where a growing crop is not present. Cover crops are available to be used in a conservation crop rotation with small grains. Both BMP’s can be combined with the overwintering cover crop BMP. This allows for a stacking of cash payments. According to Emily Kramer at the Ohio Department of Agriculture’s Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), you may stack BMP’s if they are “compatible” with each other, i.e., a producer could plant a small grain ($35/acre), apply manure and incorporate it ($35/ acres for litter and $60/acre for all other types of manure) and plant an over wintering cover crop $25/acre). They would be able to receive all 3 payments as long as all requirements of the program are met. This is just a single scenario, but one of the most common ones.
Overwintering cover crop is the use of a plant for the purpose of protecting and enriching the soil. The H2Ohio program has very specific guidelines for the use of cover crops in their BMP guidance sheet. The cover crop must follow all of these guidelines in order to qualify for the payment. The purpose of the overwintering cover crops is to reduce erosion and water quality degradation, and to increase cropping system diversity. This is applicable to crop land in the designated area that are not receiving payment under any other county, state or Federal program.
Specifications for the use of overwintering cover crops according to the All BMP Guidance Sheets (Exhibit B) include the following:
A producer must:
1. Establish overwintering cover crop no later than October 15.
2. The completed practice must meet the criteria for seeding, establishment, and maintenance per
NRCS Appendix A, including seed quality and testing requirements.3. Seed mix must include a minimum of 50% of full rate of an overwintering species.
4. Cover crop must be maintained until March 15.
5. Crop can be harvested as a forage or grazed after March 15.
6. Manure and/or fertilizer, based on the VNMP, may be applied prior to seeding or after March 15.
a. Manure shall not be applied on frozen, snow-covered, or saturated soils or applied when the
local weather forecast for the application area contains greater than a 50% chance of precipitation
exceeding one inch in a 12-hour period.
b. Fertilizer shall not be applied on frozen, snow-covered, or saturated soils or applied when the
local weather forecast for the application area contains greater than a 50% chance of precipitation
exceeding one inch in a 12-hour period.7. Producers may apply for up to three years of this practice.
There are other responsibilities that come with using this BMP. The producer will need to provide a VNMP to the SWCD, maps where cover crops are established, and seed tags or tests. The SWCD will determine eligibility and exclude any acres that fall outside of the guidelines, enter all the information, and process the payment.
References:
Best Management Practices Guidance Sheet
Emily Kramer, SWCD, Auglaize County