Buckeye Dairy News: VOLUME 24: ISSUE 4
Breadcrumb Menu
-
Milk Prices, Costs of Nutrients, Margins, and Comparison of Feedstuffs Prices
April F. White, Graduate Research Associate, Department of Animal Sciences,The Ohio State University
Milk prices
In the last issue, the Class III futures for June and July were $24.34 and $24.47/cwt, respectively. Class III milk closing price for June was $24.33/cwt, with protein and butterfat prices at $3.42 and $3.33/lb, respectively. The component price for protein is unchanged from the May issue, with butterfat price increasing as we approach Autumn. For this issue, the Class III future for August is $20.67/cwt, continuing to further decrease in September to $20.21/cwt.
Nutrient prices
It can be helpful to compare the prices in Table 1 to the 5-year averages. Since the May issue, the price of metabolizable protein (MP) has decreased by about 13%, alongside a slight increase in the price of net energy for lactation (NEL). The current price of NEL and MP are about 75 and 12% higher than the 5-year averages ($0.08/Mcal and $0.41/lb, respectively), and physically effective neutral detergent fiber (pe-NDF) is about 5% lower than the 5-year average ($0.09/lb). These nutrient costs are reflective of recent trends in ingredient costs, largely following swings in the cost of protein and energy ingredients.
To estimate profitability at these nutrient prices, the Cow-Jones Index was used for average US cows weighing 1500 lb and producing milk with 3.9% fat and 3.2% protein. For the July issue, the income over nutrient cost (IONC) for cows milking 70 and 85 lb/day is about $15.70 and $16.28/cwt, respectively. As a word of caution, these estimates of IONC do not account for the cost of replacements or dry cows, or for profitability changes related to culling cows.
Table 1. Prices of dairy nutrients for Ohio dairy farms, July 22, 2022.
Estimate of Nutrient Unit Costs Nutrient name Estimate NEl - 3X (2001) 0.147764 ** Metabolizable Protein (MP, g/kg) 0.459976 ** e-NDF 0.085522 ~ ne-NDF -0.119643 * - A blank means that the nutrient unit cost is likely equal to zero - ~ means that the nutrient unit cost may be close to zero - * means that the nutrient unit cost is unlikely to be equal to zero - ** means that the nutrient unit cost is most likely not equal to zero Economic Value of Feeds
Results of the Sesame analysis for central Ohio on July 22, 2022 are presented in Table 2. Detailed results for all 26 feed commodities are reported. The lower and upper limits mark the 75% confidence range for the predicted (break-even) prices. Feeds in the “Appraisal Set” were those for which we didn’t have a local price or were adjusted to reflect their true (“Corrected”) value in a lactating diet. One must remember that SESAME™ compares all commodities at one specific point in time. Thus, the results do not imply that the bargain feeds are cheap on a historical basis. Feeds for which a price was not reported were added to the appraisal set in this issue.
Table 2. Actual, breakeven (predicted) and 75% confidence limits of 26 feed commodities used on Ohio dairy farms, July 22, 2022.
Calibration set Name Actual [/T] Predicted [/T] Lower limit Upper limit Corrected 75.0% CI 75.0% CI Alfalfa Hay - 40 NDF 20 CP 150 RFV 210 263.233 225.063 301.403 289.744 251.574 327.914 Blood Meal, ring dried 1630 821.571 750.396 892.746 - - - Canola Meal, mech. extracted 481 323.86 308.355 339.365 - - - Corn Grain, ground, dry 230 304.954 269.43 340.478 - - - Corn Silage, 32-38% DM 60.75 100.31 87.067 113.553 100.31 87.067 113.553 Cotton Seed Meal, 41% CP 430 389.104 364.367 413.842 - - - Cotton Seed, Whole w lint 440 396.189 342.135 450.244 - - - Distillers Dried Grains w Sol 250 311.232 285.165 337.299 - - - Feathers Hydrolyzed Meal 600 652.305 610.108 694.502 - - - Gluten Feed, dry 200 275.17 255.725 294.615 - - - Gluten Meal, dry 660 673.063 626.915 719.212 - - - Hominy 200 264.144 237.221 291.066 - - - Meat Meal, rendered 515 519.284 487.323 551.246 - - - Solvent Extracted Canola Meal 481 329.051 312.931 345.172 - - - Soybean Hulls 208 148.139 102.68 193.599 - - - Soybean Meal, expellers 534 547.72 519.828 575.612 - - - Soybean Meal, solvent 44% 460 410.335 388.693 431.977 - - - Soybean Meal, solvent, 48% 470 474.25 450.561 497.939 - - - Soybean Seeds, whole roasted 530 475.91 443.207 508.613 - - - Tallow 1145 709.85 576.69 843.01 - - - Wheat Bran 170 171.624 141.065 202.183 - - - Wheat Middlings 175 203.483 177.114 229.853 - - - Appraisal set Name Actual [/T] Predicted [/T] Pred.-Act. 75.0% CI 75.0% CI Corrected Alfalfa Hay - 32 NDF 24 CP 190 RFV 0 290.595 290.595 259.472 321.718 370.128 Alfalfa Hay - 36 NDF 22 CP 170 RFV 0 287.16 287.16 252.723 321.597 340.182 Alfalfa Hay - 44 NDF 18 CP 130 RFV 0 249.429 249.429 206.636 292.223 249.429 Alfalfa Hay - 48 NDF 16 CP 110 RFV 0 233.153 233.153 185.126 281.18 206.642 Bakery Byproduct Meal 0 299.521 299.521 261.036 338.007 - Beet Sugar Pulp, dried 0 224.624 224.624 198.274 250.974 - Citrus Pulp dried 0 241.904 241.904 218.093 265.714 - Fish Menhaden Meal, mech. 0 676.096 676.096 633.738 718.455 - Molasses, Sugarcane 0 219.107 219.107 186.075 252.138 - For convenience, Table 3 summarizes the economic classification of feeds according to their outcome in the SESAME™ analysis. Feedstuffs that have gone up in price based on current nutrient values or in other words moved a column to the right since the last issue are in oversized text. Conversely, feedstuffs that have moved to the left (i.e., decreased in value) are undersized text. These shifts (i.e., feeds moving columns to the left or right) in price are only temporary changes relative to other feedstuffs within the last two months and do not reflect historical prices. Feeds added to the appraisal set were removed from this table.
Table 3. Partitioning of feedstuffs in Ohio, July 22, 2022.
Bargains At Breakeven Overpriced Alfalfa hay - 40% NDF 48% Soybean meal Mechanically extracted canola meal Feather meal Soybean meal - expeller Whole roasted soybeans Corn silage Wheat bran Soybean hulls
Distillers dried grains Gluten meal 44% Soybean meal Gluten feed Whole cottonseed Solvent extracted canola meal Meat meal Blood meal Corn, ground, dry 41% Cottonseed meal
Hominy Wheat middlings As coined by Dr. St-Pierre, I must remind the readers that these results do not mean that you can formulate a balanced diet using only feeds in the “bargains” column. Feeds in the “bargains” column offer a savings opportunity, and their usage should be maximized within the limits of a properly balanced diet. In addition, prices within a commodity type can vary considerably because of quality differences as well as non-nutritional value added by some suppliers in the form of nutritional services, blending, terms of credit, etc. Also, there are reasons that a feed might be a very good fit in your feeding program while not appearing in the “bargains” column. For example, your nutritionist might be using some molasses in your rations for reasons other than its NEL and MP contents.
Appendix
For those of you who use the 5-nutrient group values (i.e., replace MP by rumen degradable protein and digestible rumen undegradable protein), see Table 4 below.
Table 4. Prices of dairy nutrients using the 5-nutrient solution for Ohio dairy farms, July 22, 2022.
Estimate of Nutrient Unit Costs Nutrient name Estimate NEl - 3X (2001) 0.141102 ** RDP 0.147803 ~ Digestible RUP 0.424871 ** e-NDF 0.103028 ~ ne-NDF -0.076797 ~ - A blank means that the nutrient unit cost is likely equal to zero - ~ means that the nutrient unit cost may be close to zero - * means that the nutrient unit cost is unlikely to be equal to zero - ** means that the nutrient unit cost is most likely not equal to zero -
Recognizing and Managing Heat Stress in Dairy Cattle
Chris Zoller, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tuscarawas County, Ohio State University Extension
We have experienced high temperatures and uncomfortable humidity recently. These conditions are especially stressful for dairy cattle. This article will discuss the effects of and tips for managing heat stress in dairy cattle.
Cows generate heat through normal activities of eating, walking, and producing milk. Animals become stressed when the amount of heat produced is greater than what they can get rid of through breathing, sweating, or by natural or mechanical ventilation.
Heat stress is a concern because it costs you money. Reduced feed intake, lowered milk production, poor reproduction, and increased disease potential are all reasons to be concerned about the effects of heat stress on dairy cattle.
When Do Animal Experience Heat Stress?
Cows begin to feel heat stress at temperatures much lower than do people. Depending upon their level of production, temperatures as low as 65 to 72 degrees Fahrenheit can cause stress. The table below shows the effects of the temperature-humidity index (THI) on dairy cattle stress levels.

(Source: University of Minnesota)Indicators of Heat Stress
In addition to air temperature as an indicator of potential heat stress, animals often exhibit signs that indicate their level of discomfort. These include physical appearance, respiration, body temperature, and milk production. Literature from the University of Minnesota is provided below to describe these heat stress indicators.
Animals breathing with their mouths open and panting with an extended neck are physical signs to observe. Dairy cattle have a normal respiration rate between 40 and 60 breaths per minute. If 10% or more of the animals have a rate exceeding 100 breaths per minute, steps must be taken immediately to cool these animals.
The normal body temperature of an adult cow is between 101.5 and 102.5 degrees Fahrenheit. If more than 5% of the animals have a body temperature greater than 105 degrees Fahrenheit, this is an emergency.
Milk production declines as animals experience greater levels of heat stress. Under mild conditions, a decline of 2.5 lb/head/day is not uncommon. Under mild to moderate conditions, a loss of 6 lb/head/day can be expected and under moderate to severe heat stress, a decline of about 9 lb/head/day is possible. A decrease of more than 10 lb/head/day is a life-threatening condition.
Techniques to Minimize Heat Stress
Penn State University recommends using heat abatement techniques including shade, air, and water (SAW). Discussion about each of these is provided below.
Shade is used to protect animals from solar radiation and may include trees, buildings, cloth, or structures. If shade areas are constructed, a minimum of 12 feet in height is recommended.
Air exchange and circulation are two important considerations. Providing air exchange about every minute or less is critical for removing gases, heat, and moisture from buildings. Mechanically ventilated buildings accomplish this with fans and inlets. Naturally ventilated buildings rely on proper building orientation and wind speed to maximize air exchange. Air circulation speeds of 3.5 to 5 miles/hour are accomplished with mechanical ventilation. The key is to use the appropriate size and number of fans strategically placed to maximize animal comfort.
Water is necessary for drinking and evaporative cooling purposes. According to Penn State University Extension, water consumption by dairy animals can increase as much as 20% during hot weather. Make certain you have adequate supplies of high-quality water available. Water used for evaporative cooling helps increase heat transfer from the animals. There are two types of evaporative cooling systems: direct and indirect. The direct system periodically applies water to the animal’s skin to draw heat from the body. The indirect system reduces the air temperature around the animals to increase the rate of heat transfer.
Summary
Heat stress is a concern when managing dairy cattle during the hot and humid months of the year. If not managed, heat stress can result in animal discomfort, health concerns, reproductivity issues, reduced feed intake, and poor milk production. I encourage you to talk with your veterinarian, nutritionist, and Extension professional for additional advice in managing heat stress.
Sources:
Heat Stress in Dairy Cattle, University of MinnesotaHeat Stress Abatement Techniques for Dairy Cattle, Penn State University Extension
(Originally published in Farm & Dairy, July 15, 2022) -
Summer Mastitis – Insights on cause, signs, and prevention
Dr. Luciana da Costa, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University
Although it can happen year-round, cases of summer mastitis as the name implies increases from June to August, as the combination of wet weather and warmer temperatures encourage fly activity. It can affect beef and dairy cattle (heifers and dry cows as well). Below we briefly discuss the cause, the signs, and prevention measures for this important disease.
Cause
The primary causal organism is the bacteria Trueperella pyogenes (previously classified as Corynebacterium, Actinomyces and Arcanobacterium) in combination (or not) with other organisms (Streptococcus spp, Fusobacterium spp) to cause infection. Important to consider in the pathogenicity of disease are factors intrinsic to Trueperella pyogenes, such as the presence of virulence factors related to tissue damage (pyolisin) and others associated with mucosal adherence and colonization (neuraminidases, fimbriae, and collagen-binding protein). Additionally, Hydrotaea irritans, an insect closely related to the housefly is commonly considered to be the primary vector for the bacteria to cause summer mastitis in cattle. However, not only the presence of flies can cause the disease, but damage to the teat, trauma and irritation of the udder are also important risk factors.
Signs and Symptoms
Summer mastitis is a severe form of mastitis, causing udder damage with cows presenting high temperature and toxemia. Infected quarters become swollen, hard to touch, and not uncommonly lost. When stripping the infected quarter, the content can present a malodorous smell, and curds/traces of blood may appear as the damage to tissue progresses. Other symptoms can include irritability (as large numbers of flies often group around the udder, causing cows to kick frequently), high somatic cell count, reduction in milk yield, and a tendency toward increased culling risk since the recovery rate is low, even when treatment starts at an early stage. Still, some farmers decide to accept a loss in milk yield and sacrifice the infected quarter to save the cow – imperative in those cases is an early start on treatment and careful evaluation to preserve animal well-being. Better yet is to invest in preventive measures to reduce the chance of cows becoming sick.
Prevention Measures and Treatment
Not different from other diseases, prevention is the ideal strategy as much as possible. The main topics that should be considered to prevent or ultimately treat those affected cows include:
- Fly control is the first line of defense against summer mastitis. In a non-organic system, a pour-on suspension applied early in the grazing season before eggs and larvae start to develop will prevent the fly population from being out of control. Several synthetic pour-on products, such as permethrin and deltamethrin, are available to control flies. Those products that are to be applied along the back of the animal usually will give protection for 4 weeks, but in times when the incidence of summer mastitis is high, they should be considered more frequently. Be aware of withdrawal time that varies among products (meat from 3 to 14 days and milk from 0 to 6 hours). Organic farms cannot apply these products and should rely on other strategies, such as fly traps, grazing management, teat stripping, and isolation of the animal (details below).
- Grazing Conditions. Reduce larval habitats attractive to flies by removing overgrown vegetation and tall weeds which can provide cover for flies. Also, keep the area dry by eliminating standing water. Avoid cows to be near areas where likely there will be high numbers of active flies, such as soggy pastures and fields next to dense woods where flies can shelter.
- Teat Damage. Monitoring fly numbers surrounding the udder is advised as a great number of flies will increase the likelihood of infection. Animals with any teat damage should be housed if possible.
- Isolation of infected animals varies in accordance to the evaluation of condition or teat damage and the number of flies present in the environment. Affected animals should be isolated for better monitoring.
- Stripping of the udder should be undertaken as often as practical but could present a challenge due to the painful and edematous teat/gland. Be careful when doing this as kicking is common due to discomfort. When stripping, please use a container (not stripping on the floor) to avoid the risk of spreading infection. More details on stripping can be found in English Stripping to control mastitis - what are the facts behind it_Final_English.pdf (osu.edu) or Spanish Stripping to control mastitis - what are the facts behind it_SPANISH_Final.pdf (osu.edu).
- Consult your veterinarian that will consider various drugs, including parenteral antibiotic injections and/or intramammary antibiotics as well as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce fever, swelling, and pain.
-
Seeding Perennial Forages in Late Summer
Dr. Mark Sulc, Professor and Extension Forage Specialist, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University
August is the second good window of opportunity of the year for establishing perennial forages, spring being the first good planting time when conditions allow. August is also the ideal time for filling in gaps in seedings made this spring. The primary risk with late summer forage seedings is having sufficient moisture for seed germination and good plant establishment before cold weather arrives. The decision to plant should be made for each individual field, considering soil moisture status and the rainfall forecast. Rainfall and adequate soil moisture in the few weeks immediately after seeding is the primary factor affecting successful forage establishment. It is best to not use a companion crop with new late summer forage seedings because the companion crop can compete for moisture and slow the development of the desirable forage stand enough to compromise its winter survival.
No-Till Seedings
No-till seeding is an excellent choice to conserve soil moisture for seed germination in late summer. Make sure that the field surface is relatively level and smooth if you plan to no-till because you will have to live with any field roughness for multiple years of harvesting operations. No-till into wheat stubble would be an excellent option.
Sclerotinia crown and stem rot is a concern with no-till seedings of alfalfa or red clover in late summer in fields with a recent history of red clover. This pathogen causes white mold on alfalfa and clover seedlings and infects plants during the cool rainy spells in late October and November. Early August plantings dramatically improve the ability of alfalfa to resist or tolerate the infection. Late August or early September seedings are very susceptible to this disease, with mid-August plantings being intermediate.
In a no-till situation, minimize competition from existing weeds by applying glyphosate burndown before planting. Herbicide-resistant weeds, such as marestail, create a very difficult situation, and there are no effective control options in no-till management, so conventional tillage for seedbed prep is probably a better choice in those situations.
Conventional Tillage Seedings
Prepare a firm seedbed to ensure good seed-to-soil contact. Be aware that too much tillage depletes soil moisture and increases the risk of soil crusting. Follow the "footprint guide" that soil should be firm enough for a footprint to sink no deeper than one-half inch. Tilled seedbeds usually do not need a pre-plant herbicide.
Patching Spring Seedings
Where gaps exist in seedings made this spring, it is possible to drill in seed now, even in alfalfa. Autotoxicity will not be a limiting factor in alfalfa seedings made this spring. Alfalfa plants that are less than a year old do not release enough autotoxic compounds into the surrounding soil to harm new seedlings of alfalfa. So, this summer is the last opportunity to try to “patch-in” alfalfa in thin areas of alfalfa stands seeded this spring. By next spring, autotoxicity will be a concern.
Grass and/or broadleaf weeds are probably present in thin or weak areas of new spring seedings. As soon as possible, consider applying a grass herbicide to pure legume stands or a broadleaf herbicide if needed in pure grass stands. If broadleaf weeds are present in legume stands or mixed grass-legume stands, effective herbicide options are much more limited because most broadleaf herbicides labeled for use in alfalfa or other legume forages are only effective when the weeds are quite small. Before applying a herbicide, check the label for pre-plant time intervals that may be required. Use only herbicides with little or no time interval between application and seeding forages. Take a cutting in early August and then immediately drill seed into the thin areas. Try to time drilling the seed when you see some rain in the forecast, especially if the soil is dry.
The following steps improve the chances for stand establishment success, regardless of what type of seeding you are making:
- Soil fertility and pH: The recommended soil pH for alfalfa is 6.5 to 6.8. Forage grasses and clovers should have a pH of 6.0 or above. The optimal soil phosphorus level for forage legumes is 30 to 50 ppm Mehlich-3 and for grasses 20 to 30 ppm Mehlich-3. The optimal soil potassium level is 120 to 170 ppm for most of our soils.
- Check herbicide history of field. A summary table of herbicide rotation intervals for alfalfa and clovers is available at http://go.osu.edu/herbrotationintervals. Forage grasses are not included in that table, so check the labels of any herbicides applied to the field in the last 2 years for any restrictions that might exist for forage grass seedings.
- Seed selection: Be sure to use high quality seed of adapted varieties and use fresh inoculum of the proper Rhizobium bacteria for legume seeds. “Common” seed (variety not stated) is usually lower yielding and not as persistent, and from our trials, the savings in seed cost is lost within the first year or two through lower forage yields.
- Planting date: Planting of alfalfa and other legumes should be completed between late July and mid-August in Northern Ohio and between early and late August in Southern Ohio. Most cool-season perennial grasses can be planted a little later. Check the Ohio Agronomy Guide for specific guidelines (see http://go.osu.edu/forage-seeding-dates).
- Planter calibration: If coated seed is used, be aware that coatings can account for up to one-third of the weight of the seed. This affects the number of seeds planted in planters set to plant seed on a weight basis. Seed coatings can also dramatically alter how the seed flows through the drill, so calibrate the drill or planter with the seed to be planted and don’t depend on planter calibration charts. There is an excellent video on calibrating drills available at https://forages.osu.edu/video.
- Seed placement: The recommended seeding depth for forages is one-quarter to one-half inch deep. It is better to err on the side of planting shallow rather than too deep.
Do not harvest a new perennial forage stand this fall. The ONLY exception to this rule is perennial and Italian ryegrass plantings. Mow or harvest those grasses to a stubble height of two and a half to three inches in late November to improve winter survival. Do NOT cut any other forage species in the fall, especially legumes.
Scout your new forage seeding this fall on a regular basis. Post-emergence herbicide options exist for alfalfa to control late summer and fall emerging winter annual broadleaf weeds. A mid- to late fall application of Butyrac (2,4-DB), bromoxynil, Pursuit, or Raptor are the primary herbicide options for winter annual broadleaf weeds. Fall application is much more effective than a spring application for control of these weeds, especially if wild radish/wild turnip are in the weed mix. Pursuit and Raptor can control winter annual grasses in the fall in pure legume stands but cannot be used in a mixed alfalfa/grass planting. Consult the 2022 Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois (https://extensionpubs.osu.edu/crops/field-crops/) and always read the specific product label for guidelines on timing and rates before applying any product.
-
Annual Winter Forage Following Wheat Harvest
Jamie Hampton, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Auglaize County, Ohio State University Extension

The wheat has been harvested and the fields are now ready for a different purpose. Some farmers will leave them fallow for the winter, others will plant double crop soybeans, but forages for winter grazing are an option.
Most producers look to extending the grazing season to help reduce the need for storage of feed. Extending the grazing season can be accomplished by seeding into a harvested wheat field. While grazing cover crops does reduce the need for winter storage, there are other benefits to acknowledge. Grazing cover crops provides the opportunity for a significant savings in feeding costs, improved soil health, and grazing offers higher nutrient values when compared to harvested and stored forages.
While corn silage and alfalfa are the most common selections for stored forage, the list of choices for grazing is extensive, including crops such as cereal grains, oats, annual ryegrass, peas, vetch, Sudan grass, brassicas, and clovers. The crop that is selected will depend on planting date and end goal. When grazing cover crops, most producers are looking to get the most out of the crop and tend to plant a multispecies mix to provide the best nutrition for their cattle.
Annual or Italian ryegrass can be planted in late summer to produce a high-quality forage in late fall to early winter. Sudan grass, sorghum x Sudan grass hybrids, pearl millet, and forage sorghum grow rapidly in summer and produce acceptable yields. The brown midrib trait in sorghum has been shown to produce a forage as good as corn silage with less starch.
Oats and spring triticale can produce a harvestable yield by mid-October when planted in late summer. By November, this crop could be in the boot stage. Oats will not die until temperatures dip to the mid-20’s for several hours, and other grasses can survive even longer before they go dormant. This allows for late fall and early winter grazing.
Annual legume crops offer high nutritional values as a grazed crop but only in the first harvest because they do not regrow. Companion planting with legumes encourages better development of the grass crop. Field peas or soybeans added to oats and spring triticale can increase crude protein 3 to 4 percentage points when planted together. Some other annual legumes to consider would be Alyce clover and lablab (bean plant).
When including brassicas, there are a few things that need to be considered. Brassicas have very high nutrient concentrations and should be considered a concentrated feed. Research has shown some brassicas to be 18% or more crude protein and have levels of total digestible nutrients equal to or greater than 70%. Brassicas should not be more than 75% of the animal’s diet. Brassicas are not as palatable as some other forages, so it is recommended to introduce them slowly so that the animal will acclimate to the taste of the forage or use an intensive grazing strategy.
There are some management practices to keep in mind when planning for extended grazing. The cover crops that are planted should be of high-quality seed because they are providing a crop that will be harvested, just not mechanically. Consider plant disease issues; for example, you do not want to plant brassicas in the same field for more than two consecutive years because this will lead to disease buildup. When choosing your crops, consider drought resistance and if they cause health issues in your livestock. When planning to graze your summer seeded cover crops, be sure to check for any regulations concerning government programs. For example, if you participate in the H2Ohio program, you must have a grazing management plan to go along with your nutrient management plan. You can do this with your Soil and Water Conservation Board.
Double cropping annual forages offers many opportunities to produce and utilize supplemental forage within cropping systems. It increases the efficiency of land use while protecting the soil, which would otherwise sit idle and without cover for an extended period (Mark Sulc, Ohio State University).
Resources cited:
https://hayandforage.com/article-2152-are-greens-good-for-you-.html
https://ocj.com/2019/06/emergency-forages-for-planting-early-to-mid-summer/
-
Fertilizing Perennial Forages on Dairy Farms
Dr. Mark Sulc, Professor and Extension Forage Specialist, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science and Greg LaBarge, Agronomic Field Specialist, Ohio State University Extension
Early fall is one of the best times to topdress maintenance fertilizer on perennial forages. Soils are usually firm in September, and autumn topdressing provides needed nutrients for good winter survival of the forage stand and vigorous regrowth the following spring. Remember that hay crops will remove about 50 lb of K2O and 12 lb of P2O5 per ton of dry hay harvested. Adequate amounts of soil P and K are important for the productivity and persistence of forage stands. However, nutrient over-application harms the environment and can harm animals fed those forages.
A recent soil test should always guide what nutrients to apply and how much. If nutrient deficiencies are suspected, then tissue tests combined with the soil test values can be helpful in the diagnosis of nutrient issues. When recommendations call for high rates of phosphorus and potassium, there is an advantage to splitting the application, with half applied this autumn and the remainder applied next spring after the first cutting when soils are firm.
Ohio State University Extension has an Excel tool to help you determine the right rates to apply based on your soil test report. The OSU Fertility Recommendation Calculator and a user guide are available at https://forages.osu.edu/forage-management/soil-fertility-forages. We highly recommend using this tool to check any fertilizer recommendations you receive, as we have seen some fertilizer recommendations that are too high.
It is crucial not to over apply P and K. Many dairy farms have high levels of soil P, making the expense of fertilizer P unnecessary. When soil test P exceeds the agronomic level of 50 ppm, there is increased potential of P losses into streams and lakes. Applying too much K will result in luxury consumption by the forage plants, leading to excessive levels of K in the forage that can cause animal health problems.
-
Corn Silage and Foliar Disease
Jason Hartschuh, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Crawford County, Ohio State University Extension
Corn planting this year happened over a two-month time frame, making pollination very spread out this year. Currently, the earlier planted corn is from full pollination to just beginning brown silk, while later planted corn is still vegetative. The ideal time to scout corn for fungal disease and for fungicide application is from tassel through pollination. Most fields we have scouted this year show low disease pressure.
When fungal disease is present in corn silage at harvest, research shows a fungicide application at VT-R1 to control these fungal diseases reduced fiber concentration and improved nutritional value compared to the untreated control. Corn treated with fungicide had improved fermentation and more consistent dry matter values. When disease was severe, dry matter yield was also improved. When fungal disease infects corn, one of its natural responses to stop the spread of the disease is to increase lignin around the infected area which reduces digestibility.
2021 was the first-year tar spot was found in Ohio. While it is not a new disease to the mid-west, it is to Ohio. Even while working with multiple universities across the Midwest, we only have limited knowledge on its management and effects on corn silage. Currently, there are no confirmed outbreaks of tar spot in Ohio this year, but a few samples that look like tar spot have been submitted to the lab for diagnosis. Previous years have shown us that later planted corn may be at the greatest risk to losses from tar spot. One of the greatest risks to corn silage is from severe infection causing premature plant death. Tar spot reduces silage moisture, digestibility, and energy which can also lead to poor fermentation with lower silage moisture and plant sugars. Scouting for tar spot is critical and should be done weekly from tassel through R3. Lesions will be small, black, raised spots appearing on both sides of the leaves, along with leaf sheaths and husks. Spots may be on green or brown dying tissue. Spots on green tissue may have tan or brown halos. If tar spot is found in fields, a fungicide application can help slow disease spread, but be cautious of the preharvest interval of the fungicide used with some being as long as 30 days and others as short as 7 days. With silage harvesting beginning around R4 growth stage, 50% milk line, the decision to use fungicide should be closely monitored. Another option is to make sure your harvesters are ready if the corn dies prematurely so that silage moisture is at least correct with tar spot killing plants in less than two weeks under ideal conditions.
Other leaf diseases, such as gray leaf spot, northern corn leaf blight, common rust, and southern rust can also decrease digestibility and fermentation, just not as rapidly as tar spot. Gray leaf spot has gray to tan lesions developing between the veins and are distinctly rectangular with smooth, linear margins along the leaf veins. Lesions are slow to develop, needing 14 to 21 days and begin in the lower leaves. Northern corn leaf blight lesions typically have a tan color and are elliptical or cigar shaped with smooth rounded ends. Common rust is what we usually have in Ohio, but on occasion, southern rust may be present. Common rust is rarely of economic concern, but the development of southern rust can have economic yield impacts. The colors are different between the two; common rust is brownish to a cinnamon-brown while southern rust has a reddish orange appearance. Southern rust mostly develops on the top of the leaf and may be on the stems and husks, while common rust is on both sides of the leaves and generally only on the leaves. The last difference is in shape and distribution. Common rust pustules are large and oval to elongated with a scatted appearance over the leaf. Southern rust is small, circular, and evenly distributed over the leaf. Identifying the diseases present in your corn field can help you choose the best fungicide when they are needed.
Each disease has slightly different environmental conditions that they thrive in, but these conditions can overlap or happen within days of each other. Gray leaf spot is favored by warm temperatures between 70 and 90°F and high relative humidity. Northern corn leaf blight also favors wet conditions but prefers cooler weather of 64 to 80°F. Tar spot is a cool weather disease favoring temperatures from 59 to 70°F during humid conditions of 85% relative humidity or more, keeping leaves wet for greater than 7 hours. Another cool weather disease is common rust, with optimal disease conditions being temperatures of 61 to 77°F and 6 hours of leaf wetness. Southern rust is more of a late season disease, preferring the warmer temperatures of 77 to 88°F.
Maybe the biggest concern for dairy producers is mycotoxin contamination of corn silage and high moisture corn with many nutritionists encouraging levels below 1 ppm in corn utilized in the lactating cow ration. Fungicides may have the ability to reduce mycotoxin levels and improve silage digestibility.
Deoxynivalenol (DON) is one of the primary vomitoxins in Ohio corn. It is caused by the fungus Fusarium graminearum and causes both Gibberella stalk rot and Gibberella ear rot, making it of concern for both the grain and forage quality. One study under low Gibberella disease pressure, revealed that in all cases but one, an application of fungicide at R1 reduced DON levels by at least 50%. The trial was then expanded the second year, which was a high disease pressure year with DON levels as high as 17.9 ppm in one hybrid and 30.3 ppm in the other hybrid. Again, fungicide had little effect on these two brown midrib (BMR) hybrids yield or forage quality, but a few products did consistently lower DON levels. A 2021 corn silage trial in Ohio showed a vomitoxin reduction from 3.1 ppm in the control to 0.5 ppm with Miravis Neo application. The products that consistently lowered DON levels contained a triazole as one of their active ingredients, with prothioconazole being the most common. Three products that researchers across the country are seeing lower DON levels with when disease is present are Proline, Delaro, and Miravis Neo. The ideal application window from multiple studies has been R1, which is from the point when silks emerge until they become dry about 10 days later. This application is primary for Gibberlla ear rot, which infects the ears during pollination. This does create some logistical issues with application, requiring high clearance sprayers with drops for best results then over the top booms followed by an aerial application.
-
Corn Silage Harvest Safety Should Be Priority One
Jason Hartschuh, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Crawford County and Chris Zoller, Extension Educator, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tuscarawas County
Corn silage harvest is a busy time of year, with the quality of corn silage determining your ability to produce milk for the next year. During this busy time of year, safety is critical with equipment moving all over the farm and harvest causing many long days and short nights.
Hazards of Silo/Bag/Bunker Gases
While silo gases are the most dangerous, these same gases are trapped in closed bags and bunkers during fermentation. These deadly gases, nitrogen dioxide and carbon dioxide, are a natural result of ensiling. Nitrogen dioxide is heavier than air and may be seen as a reddish to yellowish-brown haze. Since it is heavier than air, it can be found near the base of a recently filled silo. It has a bleach-like smell, and you will experience a burning sensation in your nose, throat, and chest. Instant death may result from nitrogen dioxide inhalation.
Carbon dioxide fills the headspace of the silo, replacing the air. Exposure to these two gases happens most often in the first three weeks after the silo is filled. Tower silos and areas around stored silage should be treated as confined spaces. Due to this risk of exposure, it is suggested that you stay out of the silo for the first three weeks, unless wearing a self-contained breathing apparatus.
Besides holding deadly gases, silos can also become the sites of fires and explosions. Silo fires often result from ensiling feeds too low in moisture, usually below 45% moisture. The heating of the materials in combination with air leaks in the silo structure can allow a fire to start anywhere within the structure and to continue burning for long periods of time. Once a fire starts, it is very difficult to control or stop.
Safety Around Machinery
During silage harvest, there are risks of mechanical injuries around equipment, falls, roadway accidents, and crushing. To help prevent these injuries, be sure all shields and guards are always in place on equipment. Repairing a broken shield is as critical as replacing a broken chain. While you can have the best of intentions to not get caught in moving parts, all it takes is one slip or trip for major injuries to occur. Also be sure PTO shields are in place on silage wagons; the operations levers are only inches away from that shaft. Silage harvesters have many fast-moving unguarded parts around the head and the velocity of the silage leaving the chopper alone can cause injury. Make sure the machine is turned off when leaving the seat and that all moving parts have stopped before beginning repairs. Also, never allow anyone else near the chopper while it is running.
Be very cautious of falls. These can happen when climbing a silo, covering a bunker, or repairing a piece of equipment. Use ladders when climbing and look for ways to use a safety harness when over 6 feet in the air. In other industries, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires fall protection practices to be implemented when working over 6 feet in the air.
Often during harvest, silage is hauled down the road. Now is the time to inspect lights and turn signals on tractors, trucks, trailers, and wagons. Also be sure any slow-moving vehicle (SMV) is equipped with a highly reflective SMV sign. During harvest, be sure to wash SMV signs and lights so that they can easily be seen. Also make window and mirror washing on all equipment a daily requirement. If tractors do not have a left-hand mirror, look for a way to add one so that you can easily check for motorists that may be passing you while you are trying to turn left.
With all the additional moving equipment around the farm, be cautious of people walking around moving equipment. First be sure everyone is aware of the additional equipment moving around the farm. If backup beepers have been turned off or disabled in any way, now is the time to turn them back on or repair them. While they are loud and annoying, they do save lives. One additional safety strategy is to have everyone wear bright colors so that they can be easily seen, especially if working after dusk. The addition of reflective vests improves visibility.
Rollover Safety
Tractor rollover is a concern when packing silage piles and bunkers. According to the National Ag Safety Database, tractor overturns account for an average of 130 deaths per year in the U.S., with 80% of overturns occurring by experienced operators and one in 10 operators will overturn a tractor in their lifetime.
A properly sized tractor must be equipped with a rollover protective structure and a seat belt. Rollover protective structures became available in the mid-1960s. These structures were not available for all new tractors until the mid-1970s. They were not standard equipment on new tractors until 1985. But these structures and seat belts are 99.9% effective in preventing deaths due to tractor overturns.
Summary
Silage harvest is a busy time and brings with it potential hazards that can cause injury or death. We encourage you to take the time now to inspect equipment, make needed repairs or adjustments, and use extreme caution.
Additional resources are available from the Ohio State University Extension Ag Safety and Health Program at: https://agsafety.osu.edu/.