Dr. Normand St-Pierre, Dairy Management Specialist, The Ohio State University.
What will be the average US corn yield this year? Is China buying corn? Can Brazil compensate for the US acreage reduction in soybeans? These are just a few among many questions whose answers will affect the US grains and oilseeds markets in the next year. Because of the uncertainty, be prepared for very volatile markets. Feed prices can change very quickly. What was a bargain feedstuff one month may be overpriced the next month.
At the time of this writing (early September 2007), most feedstuffs were expensive from a historical perspective. Some, however, were inexpensive relative to other feeds. As usual, SESAMETM (available at www.sesamesoft.com) was used to estimate implicit prices of nutrients from market prices of 29 commodities available in central Ohio (Table 1). Net energy lactation is still at a very high price, approaching $0.14/Mcal compared to a 10-year average of about $0.07/Mcal. Rumen degradable protein is currently very inexpensive, whereas digestible rumen undegradable protein is priced about at the average long-term price. Non-effective neutral detergent fiber (NDF) is cheap (markets are discounting this nutrient), whereas effective NDF is priced at the upper end of its historical trends. In short, dietary energy is currently very expensive and should impact the diet formulation strategy used by field nutritionists.
Table 1. Prices of nutrients, central Ohio.
Nutrient name |
May 2006
|
July 2007
|
September 2007
|
Net energy for lactation - 3X (NRC, 2001; $/Mcal) |
0.072
|
0.148
|
0.136
|
Rumen degradable protein ($/lb) |
-0.013
|
-0.163
|
-0.173
|
Digestible-rumen undegradable protein ($/lb) |
0.200
|
0.169
|
0.252
|
Non-effective neutral detergent fiber (NDF; $/lb) |
-0.027
|
-0.095
|
-0.076
|
Effective-NDF ($/lb) |
0.065
|
0.044
|
0.070
|
In Tables 2 and 3, we report the results for 27 feed commodities traded in central Ohio. Although corn price is high from a historical perspective, corn is currently a bargain compared to other feedstuffs in the market. The price of many feeds has risen in sympathy with corn, but many, such as tallow, have overshot their economic values.
Using nutrient prices and milk component prices, we can calculate a benchmark for feed costs and income over nutrient costs.
Table 2. Grouping of feed commodities, central Ohio, November 2006.
Bargains
|
At Breakeven
|
Overpriced
|
Corn grain | Alfalfa hay - 44% NDF | Beet pulp |
Corn silage | Bakery byproduct | Brewers grains |
Distillers dried grains | Canola meal | Citrus pulp |
Feather meal | Cottonseed meal | Gluten meal |
Gluten feed | Whole cottonseed | Meat meal |
Hominy | Molasses | Soybean hulls |
Expeller soybean meal | Tallow | 44% Soybean meal |
Roasted soybeans |
Wheat bran | 48% Soybean meal |
Wheat middlings |
Table 3. Commodity assessment, central Ohio, July 2007.
Name |
Actual ($/ton)
|
Predicted ($/ton)
|
Lower limit ($/ton)
|
Upper limit ($/ton)
|
Alfalfa Hay, 44% NDF, 20% CP |
140
|
141.14
|
112.91
|
169.38
|
Bakery Byproduct Meal |
185
|
196.46
|
182.35
|
210.58
|
Beet Sugar Pulp, dried |
220
|
157.61
|
135.53
|
179.69
|
Brewers Grains, wet |
41.6
|
31.35
|
26.69
|
36.02
|
Canola Meal, mech. extracted |
155.60
|
142.64
|
124.80
|
160.48
|
Citrus Pulp, dried |
229
|
167.33
|
155.59
|
179.07
|
Corn Grain, ground dry |
149
|
208.39
|
195.25
|
221.52
|
Corn Silage, 32 to 38% DM |
50
|
68.32
|
58.50
|
78.14
|
Cottonseed Meal, 41% CP |
190
|
194.60
|
179.28
|
209.92
|
Cottonseed, whole w lint |
230
|
241.82
|
205.54
|
278.09
|
Distillers Dried Grains, w solubles |
119
|
179.44
|
161.42
|
197.46
|
Feather Hydrolyzed Meal |
275
|
327.85
|
299.49
|
356.21
|
Gluten Feed, dry |
107
|
151.84
|
138.21
|
165.46
|
Gluten Meal, dry |
435
|
393.87
|
357.08
|
430.67
|
Hominy |
136
|
171.36
|
159.37
|
183.35
|
Meat Meal, rendered |
305
|
260.10
|
236.07
|
284.12
|
Molasses, sugarcane |
150
|
147.85
|
136.62
|
159.08
|
Soybean Hulls |
137
|
78.69
|
47.85
|
109.52
|
Soybean Meal, expellers |
296.5
|
335.56
|
310.97
|
360.15
|
Soybean Meal, solvent 44% CP |
252.5
|
194.25
|
170.27
|
218.24
|
Soybean Meal, solvent 48% CP |
261.5
|
236.28
|
215.42
|
257.14
|
Soybean Seeds, whole roasted |
313
|
317.23
|
296.24
|
338.22
|
Tallow |
575
|
557.65
|
513.45
|
601.84
|
Wheat Bran |
73
|
91.14
|
69.84
|
112.44
|
Wheat Middlings |
66
|
110.55
|
91.98
|
129.13
|
Appraisal Set
|
|||
Name |
Actual ($/ton)
|
Predicted ($/ton)
|
Corrected ($/ton)
|
Alfalfa Hay - 38% NDF, 22% CP |
160
|
139.48
|
172.35
|
Alfalfa Hay - 48% NDF, 17% CP |
130
|
145.00
|
122.89
|
Blood meal, ring dried |
745
|
460.76
|
--
|
Fish Menhaden Meal, mech. |
970
|
373.74
|
--
|
Results are presented in Table 4. The costs of feeding for a milk yield of 75 lb/day at 3.6% fat and 3.1% protein has gone up $1.32/cow per day since May 2006. This translates to an increase in feed costs of $1.76/cwt during the same period. Current milk prices, however, generate additional gross income over feed cost of $5.59/cow per day when comparing May 2006 to September 2007. At $10.41/cow per day, the current income over feed cost is substantially greater than the average of $6.25 to 6.50/cow per day that we have experienced over the last five years. Clearly, dairy production is currently very profitable, which compensates for the disastrous year that dairy producers went through in 2006.
Table 4. Nutrient costs and income over nutrient costs, central Ohio.1
Nutrient |
May 2006
|
July 2007
|
September 2007
|
------------------------------ $/cow/day --------------------------------
|
|||
Nutrient costs2 |
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
5.13
|
4.71
|
|
(0.07)
|
(0.86)
|
(0.92)
|
|
0.45
|
0.38
|
0.57
|
|
(0.13)
|
(0.44)
|
(0.35)
|
|
0.71
|
0.48
|
0.76
|
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
|
3.65
|
4.89
|
4.97
|
Milk gross income |
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
4.44
|
4.29
|
|
4.47
|
8.62
|
9.16
|
|
0.67
|
2.58
|
1.93
|
|
8.47
|
15.64
|
15.38
|
|
|
|
|
Income over nutrient costs |
4.82
|
10.75
|
10.41
|
1Costs and income for a 1400 lb cow producing 75 lb/day of milk, with 3.6% fat, 3.1% protein, and 5.9% other solids. Component prices are for Federal Order 33, October 2006.
2NEL = Net energy for lactation, RDP = rumen degradable protein, RUP = rumen undegradable protein, ne-NDF = noneffective neutral detergent fiber, and e-NDF = effective neutral effective fiber.